I think a eye for a eye would be unfair becuase if your rich you dont get in as much trubble as if your poor. if you were poor it could end up very bad if you had no food becuase if you stoll food then you could get in lot of trubble. If you were rich and you stoll something then you would be in less trouble. This rule would be unfair becuase it treats people differntly depending on your social status and how much money you have. People from ancient countrys werent as civalized as people now so I could see them having more strict laws becuase there were probally more people out of there percentage of population breaking laws so yah I could see why it was more strict.
I think this law would be a unfair law becuase people are treated differntly depending on there social status.
Popular Posts
-
I really enjoy Social Studies, but to be more specific I love Ancient History! I think one of the most interesting times in Ancient Hist...
-
- -I have read from Junhyoung's post about adoption in Africa, and realized everyone thinks that they are through the racist era a...
-
Well, in the ancient world, there are a couple of civilizations, Chinese, Phoenicians, Israelites, Egyptians, and many others. Have you hear...
-
When I was looking through the previous blog posts, I wanted to learn more about Tanuja's post. The African trypanosomiasis, or sleep...
-
An Eye for An Eye Is it really fair? In 1792 BC Hammurabi ruled the Babylonia Empire. While he ruled...
No comments:
Post a Comment