Popular Posts
-
I HATE History, it is very and I mean very boring. If I bothered trying to understand the things I learned in my social study class ...
-
Recently, the Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling had some things to say about Black African Americans playing basketball in the NBA...
-
I've always been interested in ancient culture and especially ancient Greek. When I was in third grade, I discovered the Percy...
-
In Chris Bulock's recent post he talked about Malaria and how it's affecting Africa. I was interested in this because of all the...
-
- -I have read from Junhyoung's post about adoption in Africa, and realized everyone thinks that they are through the racist era a...
Sunday, October 20, 2013
An eye for something unequal to an eye
I wonder why Hammurabi decided to make a law intended fairly all crapped up. For example if a slave struck his owner "his ear shall be cut off." Slaves value is not in his ear and he should not be a slave in the first place. I believe he meant it to be fair. It just ended up being really unfair. Also it's like men are separated by class. How would a man be classified as a gentleman?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ReplyDeleteWow! I agree with you for part of that, I mean if the slave hit the master. The servant should not be punished for the deed, but I think the servant should be punished but not that cruelly, maybe like extra woks he/she has to perform after their normal shift is done. A man might be classified as gentlemen, when he comes of age to participate in manly events, like coming to sporting events or being in the council. Why don't women get as many rights as men back then?
I also agree about that because I don’t think it’s fair for someone to be punished that severely. I mean if they hit their boss then they would be punished but not like that. They should like work extra hours so they would make up for it but cutting there ear off that is just not right. What would you do if your worker had struck you?
ReplyDelete