Popular Posts
-
The book I am reading is now is the time for running it is about a kid in north Africa whose village was killed by the north African pres...
-
In my book, A Long Walk To Water , most of the book takes place in Sudan in 1985 where there is civil conflict between the North and South ...
-
Iqbal is based on a true story. It's about a boy named Iqbal Masih , who inspired the lives of other children. A young girl named ...
-
In my book Facing The Lion A young boy named Joseph Lekuton has to deal with both school and being a Northern Kenyan cattle herder. Kenya d...
-
One day in a man made pool in Schroda Dam the Water Research Group of North West University found unusual behavior in the African tigerfish,...
Sunday, October 20, 2013
An eye for something unequal to an eye
I wonder why Hammurabi decided to make a law intended fairly all crapped up. For example if a slave struck his owner "his ear shall be cut off." Slaves value is not in his ear and he should not be a slave in the first place. I believe he meant it to be fair. It just ended up being really unfair. Also it's like men are separated by class. How would a man be classified as a gentleman?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ReplyDeleteWow! I agree with you for part of that, I mean if the slave hit the master. The servant should not be punished for the deed, but I think the servant should be punished but not that cruelly, maybe like extra woks he/she has to perform after their normal shift is done. A man might be classified as gentlemen, when he comes of age to participate in manly events, like coming to sporting events or being in the council. Why don't women get as many rights as men back then?
I also agree about that because I don’t think it’s fair for someone to be punished that severely. I mean if they hit their boss then they would be punished but not like that. They should like work extra hours so they would make up for it but cutting there ear off that is just not right. What would you do if your worker had struck you?
ReplyDelete