Popular Posts
-
As many of you know Algeria had a plane crash. As a result of the crash 77 people died out of the 78 on board the plane. Although, one ...
-
Why do people have to do that? I think sports games are something that many people use as an excuse to relax, hang out with friends, and jus...
-
Sleeping sickness is an illness in African that is caused by flies. The s ymptoms are at stage one are Facial edema Painless skin ch...
-
If you like watching people dressed up as tigers and dance for two days, then you're in luck! In Thrissur, India there is a festival...
-
I often struggle with word choice . Out of all 10 of the places to go I would like to go to Temples at Bagan in Myanmar. I would love to ...
Sunday, October 20, 2013
An eye for something unequal to an eye
I wonder why Hammurabi decided to make a law intended fairly all crapped up. For example if a slave struck his owner "his ear shall be cut off." Slaves value is not in his ear and he should not be a slave in the first place. I believe he meant it to be fair. It just ended up being really unfair. Also it's like men are separated by class. How would a man be classified as a gentleman?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
ReplyDeleteWow! I agree with you for part of that, I mean if the slave hit the master. The servant should not be punished for the deed, but I think the servant should be punished but not that cruelly, maybe like extra woks he/she has to perform after their normal shift is done. A man might be classified as gentlemen, when he comes of age to participate in manly events, like coming to sporting events or being in the council. Why don't women get as many rights as men back then?
I also agree about that because I don’t think it’s fair for someone to be punished that severely. I mean if they hit their boss then they would be punished but not like that. They should like work extra hours so they would make up for it but cutting there ear off that is just not right. What would you do if your worker had struck you?
ReplyDelete