Popular Posts

  • Bhutanese Cuisine? YES
    As you know, every country has its own specialties, for foods I mean. In Bhutan , the specialty is  dairy products, or (to be more specifi...
  • Paris of the east
    If had to choose a place to visit in the middle east, it should be Lebanon. Lebanon is a very beautiful place to visit.  Lebanon  has beau...
  • (no title)
    If I were going to the Middle East, I would visit the Grand Egyptian Museum in Cairo, Egypt. It is only two kilometers from the great pyrami...
  • The Olympics
    In Ancient Greece the Olympics were a big deal. The Olympics were so important to them that they called a truce for all the wars so everyone...
  • Nothing But Nets, What is it about?
    Nothing But Nets is a website that describes African malaria death rates and lets you buy insecticide treated nets for them. I think this ...

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

What the NBA should do.

I believe that even though Donald Sterling is the Owner of the team there is a catch. He is forbidden to do business with the League, in other words if he refuses to sell his team the Clippers can not be part of the NBA. I think this is exactly what NBA commissioner Silver should do. However, after being kicked out of the NBA, Sterling decides to sell, the Clippers should be allowed to become apart of the NBA once more. Involving things the players can do to protest well let me see- HE TOLD HIS GIRLFRIEND "NOT TO BRING BLACK PEOPLE TO GAMES ANYMORE" and well 12/14 PLAYERS ON THE CLIPPER'S TEAM ARE AFRICAN AMERICAN. So, if he doesn't want these people I guess the Clippers can just go into the playoffs with only two team members or less (I mean players should completely boycott games, forcing the Clippers to forfeit and leading to a dramatic loss of profit for Sterling. See any holes in my theory? please comment.
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousMay 1, 2014 at 1:08 PM

    One, you need a link. Anyway, I don't think the Clippers shouldn't be part of the NBA. This is because, it was already affiliated as a team, it wouldn't be fair to not be excluded the NBA. To the players, it would be totally unfair just because of one person; their owner. So, I think the rest should keep on playing, while the owner sells the team to somewhere else. The owner should use the money from selling the team to play the players. But this is my part. Would you have the money from selling the team given to the players?

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)